on
RE:
We have long offered our customers “sample permissions” for the OnPrem solution based on the company's organizational roles. For example, there are basic roles that only contain rudimentary rights for logging in and creating (e.g. Sales Basic for creating sales documents, Purchase Basic for purchase orders, etc.). All booking functions for the respective business area are further (additional) roles, so you remain flexible, because often not everyone in a department is allowed to book. By creating smaller modules for specific tasks in addition to the basic roles, a rights concept can be set up flexibly. By using a descriptive name, a permission administrator can later recognize which permissions have been assigned to a user. With the new logic of referencing other permission sets, you also remain updateable when new versions are imported. Finally, customers can better identify themselves with their “own” roles and continue to manage permissions independently.
RE:
Is there any timeline by when this will be implemented?
RE:
This idea is a no-brainer if you ask me, it surprised me that interactions do not work form the Filters pane.
RE:
Since this is so very confusing, it causes problem with the trust people have with the data. Power BI is supposed to be a self-serving BI tool. When the totals don't match the users have two options:Use another toolExport to Excel. Usually, they would export the data to Excel - that's what I would do. I have done it several times since I wanted to share valuable information with my Finance team. An Accountant or an Analyst might now their job really well - they don't care that much about "Power BI" and coding, they are just tools for them, and this is a huge issue.
RE:
This would be a great addition
RE:
We've already build this very generic for every table and every cue is highly customizable - maybe something we can discuss about? Also available for free with limited number of cues:https://appsource.microsoft.com/de-DE/product/dynamics-365-business-central/PUBID.beyonditgmbhkiel%7CAID.beyond-cues%7CPAPPID.98fcfe84-9b76-4f8e-81a3-77d85907bdd2?tab=Overview
RE:
6 years later - please allow us to update the Segment members view in Real-time Marketing.
RE:
This will be "the" killer feature for us to migrate to Fabric
RE:
100% agree.I am currently setting up new GL Budget process for my current company. While investigating best practice and method, I have had to re-insert especially the date filter a hundred times. It seems bonkers this is not already included. Especially because we have a crooked fiscal year going 0107 - 3006.Whether it's a saved filter or report setting as Don Dyck suggests doesn't change much to. You would need to be able to extend/reduce the date if needed either way. I have no preference there. Though a report setting might make it more visible to the user.
RE:
This. Very much this!Am currently doing Budget process for my new company, and I actually thought you could already do this. Being able to do it the same way we edit 'Journals' would make budget proces so incredibly easy! Especially when including dimensions.