on
RE:
We've already build this very generic for every table and every cue is highly customizable - maybe something we can discuss about? Also available for free with limited number of cues:https://appsource.microsoft.com/de-DE/product/dynamics-365-business-central/PUBID.beyonditgmbhkiel%7CAID.beyond-cues%7CPAPPID.98fcfe84-9b76-4f8e-81a3-77d85907bdd2?tab=Overview
RE:
6 years later - please allow us to update the Segment members view in Real-time Marketing.
RE:
This will be "the" killer feature for us to migrate to Fabric
RE:
100% agree.I am currently setting up new GL Budget process for my current company. While investigating best practice and method, I have had to re-insert especially the date filter a hundred times. It seems bonkers this is not already included. Especially because we have a crooked fiscal year going 0107 - 3006.Whether it's a saved filter or report setting as Don Dyck suggests doesn't change much to. You would need to be able to extend/reduce the date if needed either way. I have no preference there. Though a report setting might make it more visible to the user.
RE:
This. Very much this!Am currently doing Budget process for my new company, and I actually thought you could already do this. Being able to do it the same way we edit 'Journals' would make budget proces so incredibly easy! Especially when including dimensions.
RE:
Please add this function, it would really make BC a more userfriendly application.
RE:
Please bring this function back, a lot of clients (especially the ones coming from NAV) are missing this function.
RE:
My organization currently sees no added value in using Copilot, also looking at the still somewhat unclear areas where the company data goes. Hiding the Copilot Icon would be very desirable!
RE:
As highlighted here https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Desktop/Increase-Space-between-date-slicers/td-p/3705109 it feels wird to have empty space in the right side of the slicer, instead of the if we have option to modify it would be great.
RE:
Hi!Incoterms are required. The usage is worldwide common.And Incoterm is not valid without Incoterm City (Place) and it is different to Ship-to City.We had this Gap 20 years ago in Navision, now moving to D354 FSCM and I am wondering this is still not solved?Needed for both: Procurement and Sales.