on
RE:
hey
It's been a while, but I came across an article online about microsoft.com and felt compelled to email you guys to disprove this review.
It looks like there's some unfavorable news that could be potentially damaging.
Understanding how easily stories can get out of hand and hoping not you to be taken by surprise, I decided to warn you.
Here's where I came across the info:
https://ibit.ly/H11Pp
I hope it's all a simple confusion, but I believed it necessary you should know!
Best wishes,
Penelope
RE:
Very important - Purchase receive: partial delivery and auto batch group are very dangerous in this scenario. D365 always receives the not synced transactions.
RE:
would be a good feature to have for embedding into power point as well. current resize options are very limited when you have multiple cards in the visual.
RE:
I concur but also want this available for writing to a different schema in Lakehouses.Scott
RE:
It would be useful if it could be alight to the top of the card to allow for additional white space under the value where you could then place more useful additional information
RE:
I agree with the previous comments. It would simplify our work enormously.
RE:
We are experiencing the same issue. Still not having project purchase order lines supported through the landed costs module limits the solution for clients who have 100% project based business and have outsource transport and logistics (so must use the Landed costs for precise GIT and cost tracking). Microsoft should build Landed costs as a fully integrated module with the existing ones especially when there is evident need.
RE:
Well said. I am just facing it right now and it would be perfect to have this option.
RE:
Multiple users are facing the issue and feature is not working as expected.
RE:
This would be fantastic!