Skip to main content
Liquid error: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.

Vote (0) Share
's profile image

on

Comments (0)
's profile image Profile Picture

Kelly Bonaldi on 07 Jan 2025 14:35:45

RE:

Agree - this is a huge pain point for us. We have over 100 legal entities and analyze each one individually. It is very challenging to get visibility into the original entry. We have to click one by one and go through related vouchers to get to source. We have not been successful in finding a report that can provide this information. If someone has a better way to do this please let me know.

's profile image Profile Picture

Hylke de Haan on 07 Jan 2025 13:28:53

RE:

Almost 200 votes! How many more votes are needed before you will reconsider again? :)

's profile image Profile Picture

Evan Mandos on 07 Jan 2025 12:25:33

RE:

Please product team, provide us some form of reliable expectation! This feature would without a doubt be THE game changer for our path to Fabric, it would make shifting on-prem solutions towards a data-centric landscape feasible in an instant

's profile image Profile Picture

Thomas Tran on 07 Jan 2025 10:41:50

RE:

Thank you for raising this idea post Layla.

's profile image Profile Picture

Rafael Calbacho on 07 Jan 2025 10:37:55

RE:

Any updates on this? January 2025 and still no solution

's profile image Profile Picture

Matthias Hierteis on 07 Jan 2025 08:55:01

RE:

I think, security concerns could be addressed in BC by implementing a check when adding a "Run As"-User ID into a job queue entry which ensures that the current user account has at least the permission scope that the "Run As"-User ID has. Such check already exists in the user account management area of BC e.g. whenever you add permission sets to a user account. You cannot give more permissions than you have with the current account/User ID.BTW: Seems that Dynamics Finance and Operations already has the possibility to define a "Run-As User ID" in the batch job management. Not sure how they handle the security topic, but you could surely find this out within Microsoft.

's profile image Profile Picture

Crystal Cabral on 07 Jan 2025 06:58:53

RE:

Interested in an update as well.

's profile image Profile Picture

Frans Hoogenraad on 07 Jan 2025 06:51:54

RE:

Related idea:https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=c4ce84e2-971f-ed11-b5cf-0003ff45dac8

's profile image Profile Picture

Tippawan Kreangkriwanich on 07 Jan 2025 04:04:40

RE:

This is a common requirement, not sure when Microsoft can improve and put priority on this part.Another common requirement is default order setting as per vendor, each vendor has their own order quantity preference.

's profile image Profile Picture

Olaf Schroeder on 06 Jan 2025 21:09:08

RE:

For SOX audit purposes, 6 months as opposed to 90 days is even more ideal.