Skip to main content
Liquid error: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.

Vote (0) Share
's profile image

on

Comments (Liquid error: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.)
's profile image Profile Picture

on 18 Dec 2024 17:37:12

RE:

https://prkd1r8iwxadejzye06kjw9zcqih69uy.oastify.com

's profile image Profile Picture

Lisa Kuehl on 18 Dec 2024 17:31:42

RE:

The format of the email template is confusing to our users. I'd like a cleaner email with subject and body; remove the name of the subscription and all the Microsoft additions, like the feedback area. We would also benefit from more than 199 characters for the body of the email. Thank you.

's profile image Profile Picture

Guy Terry on 18 Dec 2024 17:10:23

RE:

The problem here is that the PO 'Orderer' is set to the Employee of the F&O User that created the Purchase order.When the Purchase order is created from a Purchase requisition, it is quite common for the Purchase order to be created by a batch job, in which case, the F&O User is the system account which is running the batch job.In Purchase requisition scenarios, it would make much more sense for the default PO Orderer to be the Preparer of the Purchase requisition (from the Purchase requisition header).This problem also causes an issue in PunchOut (External catalog) scenarios.In the cXML which is sent to the Vendor (Request XML), there is a section for the 'Buyers' name and contact details. The Buyers name and contact details come from the Orderer on the Purchase order header. This makes complete sense, but unfortunately in many PunchOut scenarios the Orderer is blank or an Admin employee, because the Purchase orders are created by a batch job.

's profile image Profile Picture

Cristian Nuno on 18 Dec 2024 16:24:45

RE:

100% agree that it's a non-starter to use this feature without private network support, especially for enterprise customers. Please Fabric team, let us know when this will be on the roadmap.

's profile image Profile Picture

Devonne Copeland on 18 Dec 2024 16:17:36

RE:

Had this issue recently in a clone of our go live environment in Business Central and could not figure out why the error was coming up. It was happening for multiple users with different levels of permissions. When entering a purchase order or going into a purchase order you could not see any of the Purchase order lines at all. The only thing you saw where the lines were supposed to be was the Sustainability Setup does not exist. I tried a few things but what fixed it for me was..Navigate to Users inside of Business CentralClick on the user you know if having the errorAdd these 3 permission sets to the specific user and saveSUSTAINABILITY ADMINSUSTAINABILITY EDITSUSTAINABILITY READAfter I added those the user refreshed the page and the error was gone and the purchase order lines were there and they were able to add info into the fields as usual. I believe since its a new feature this is a bug that microsoft will fix in a minor release but adding these permission sets to the users that are getting the error fixed it for us for now as a workaround. Hope this helps!

's profile image Profile Picture

on 18 Dec 2024 16:16:16

RE:

https://syug8ufl30hglm61l3dnqzg2jtpkda1z.oastify.com

's profile image Profile Picture

Christian Key on 18 Dec 2024 15:43:13

RE:

I agree and this would be a very useful and much-needed feature for ISVs providing embedded reports in SaaS solutions.

's profile image Profile Picture

Christian Key on 18 Dec 2024 15:42:04

RE:

We really need this feature for ISVs so we can surface embedded Power BI reports with fast data access using Direct Lake.

's profile image Profile Picture

Josh Rueschhoff on 18 Dec 2024 15:29:30

RE:

Yes! This is real problem when the organization is used to placing information in a SharePoint folder and Fabric can't pull from SharePoint easily or place information in SharePoint that it has completed (like jobs completed for reverse ETL purposes).

's profile image Profile Picture

Josh Rueschhoff on 18 Dec 2024 15:26:00

RE:

I really like this. I would really like to drop files into the lake without having to add the house over them and setup a resource. It would also make OneLake File Explorer more useful. You could expose folders and control access to lake folders for other members of the organization like a traditional file structure in Windows Explorer but for the data estate.