on
RE:
This would be a great feature to allow for a better user experience when using cross report drill-through.
RE:
I am a big believer of "infrastructure as code" and having this little feature prevent for move to automated everything as code doesn't make sense to me as MSFT has all those great tools such as Azure DevOps, etc. Please have this feature high prioirty and give us to be able to add/remove DG when necessary. Thank you!
RE:
I am a big believer of "infrastructure as code" and having this little feature prevent for move to automated everything as code doesn't make sense to me as MSFT has all those great tools such as Azure DevOps, etc. Please have this feature high prioirty and give us to be able to add/remove DG when necessary. Thank you!
RE:
I totally agree on this. This happened for one of my client. We need to have a parameter that will prevent from deleting production orders in the ended status which could be kept for auditng and tracibility.
RE:
This is a very basic feature, and I'm surprised it's not available in the Advanced Editor. The entire Power Query UI and shortcuts is lacking, IMO.
RE:
Deployment / implementation almost align same as others. Its unfortunate there is no update / progress on this request. Anyone from MSFT view these comments ?
RE:
Deployment / implementation almost align same as others. Its unfortunate there is no update / progress on this request. Does any one from MSFT view these comments ?
RE:
Being able to select a relevant UOM for making qty adjustments would reduce friction and improve efficiency among our user base.
RE:
it's a shame that Power BI doesn't have such simple functionality.
RE:
Would it be possible to delay committing data to the lakehouse until the SQL endpoint sync is complete? Or introduce a new transaction isolation level where the user can choose to wait for the endpoint to be sync'd.