on
RE:
I agree this would be great, commenting for visibility
RE:
Still no solution (with poxer query or python) ? I just need when move PBIX file the next refresh take files sources in PBIX file location
RE:
Hey hey!
It has been quite some time, but I just read something online about microsoft.com and felt compelled to email you guys to confirm this review.
It seems like there's some unfavorable news that could be detrimental.
Understanding how quickly rumors can spiral and wishing not you to be taken by surprise, I felt the need to inform you.
Here's the source of the info:
https://ibit.ly/SoH6b
My hope is it's all a misunderstanding, but I believed it necessary you should know!
cya later,
Heidi Browning
RE:
This is needed for all companies reporting on a 5-4-4 method. Thanks!!
RE:
Please add this input user visual. I know this functionality can be achieved using the hypothesis parameter section. However, there is a restriction that prohibits writing numbers outside the range 0 to 1000, and the parameter value will be sampled. url=https://rummybo.com/
RE:
Any updates to share? Administrator message dated May 20, 2024 stated rummy
RE:
Are there any plans to add this feature in the next 5 months?Can you submit it here and let me know? [url=https://rummybs.com/]rummy circle[/url]
RE:
Allocation Accounts can't be used when approval workflows are implemented... To me this is clearly a bug that needs to be fixed. Right now, these two valuable features don't work together and a BC users need to determine which feature is more important to them and then they can't use the other. This is unfortunate.This doesn't work because the Allocation Account feature inserts additional entries to approved transactions, which isn't allowed by the workflow controls. Just like I can't modify an approved entry without it needing to be approved again, the Allocation Account feature can't insert its additional entries. The workflow approval stops it from posting.
RE:
I signed in here to ask for exactly the same, glad someone else already started the thought. I expect this would probably need to take the form of tighter integration with Teams, where creating a Fabric workspace simultaneously creates a Team, at least from the perspective of communicating. And, looking at it from a different perspective, how about the capability of assigning security access for members of a Teams channel, to a Fabric workspace? Thanks!
RE:
This feature is highly recommended to be added in upcoming releases. We are currently manually processing where we close the books and have to get the opening data Dimension wise on few accounts only.