on
RE:
I would also suggest a re- arrange of the menu items/modules in the left menu. (We'll the menu systems needs a re-design/adjustment.)One possibility would be to group each module and menu item under each product , Finance, Supply Chain, Commerce, HR.(and at the same time make the product naming a bit more clear..)I would also suggest to make the submenus groups (setup etc) some how fixed/static to each location, is really really really hard and annoying to find things when you expand/collapse the menus and the menu items jumps around to different places of the screen so that you'll never find it. And perhaps make the menus full-screen when opened and not just 3/4 of the web interface.
RE:
I would also suggest a re- arrange of the menu items/modules in the left menu. (We'll the menu systems needs a re-design/adjustment.)One possibility would be to group each module and menu item under each product , Finance, Supply Chain, Commerce, HR.I would also suggest to make the submenus groups (setup etc) some how fixed/static to each location, is really really really hard and annoying to find things when you expand/collapse the menus and the menu items jumps around to different places of the screen so that you'll never find it.
RE:
Just yesterday I was able to upload a tar.gz file to my resources and I ALMOST installed it with devtools::install_local, which also installs cran dependencies. But when I went to fix the issues it told me the file type is not supported when I tried to upload again. This is very frustrating and I don't have a path forward.
RE:
This is so needed, any progress update on this?
RE:
HOW IS THIS STILL OPEN SINCE 2015!?!?!?!?
RE:
an essential move as it makes no sense to post like it is
RE:
@Per Lynnerup,Is there a published roadmap for Landed cost, as mentioned previously?I have a client that is backing away from implementing Landed cost due to the restricted use concerned with inter-company.
RE:
This is such a basic functionality that should have been available on day 1 !
RE:
I have a customer that wants this exact scenario and was told by MSFT to raise an idea, so really happy that this has already been raised, and has gained a good level of votes. I have voted, but also wanted to comment that this would really help MSFT get some traction in the loyalty area. Currently, this is a major blocker, along with the inability to earn and redeem on the same transaction on POS.
RE:
I find it so hard to believe this has been up here for nearly 10 years (!!) and nothing is done. Especially with NIS2 coming up, this is a must.