on
RE:
Hello,We can propose a first version that we already use since months (first use 19/07/2023), after removing the sources and credentials.Here is our context:We have a fairly complex data refresh schedule that varies every day with a large number of data refreshes. We noticed that the refreshes took longer at certain times, and varied slightly from one day to the next (between 0:00 and 3:00 and then around 6:00), without any warning about the occupancy of the source systems or the on-premise gateway services.To analyze this phenomenon, we built 2 identical reports:- dataset type, then dataflow type (both are concerned)- to a single SAP Hana source (currently being upgraded to add a Sharepoint source, so without on-premise gateway flow)- The 2 Datasets and Dataflow are identical, same HANA view, same transformation in Power Query. The only difference is in the Gateway used for each refresh. In one case, we use the Gateway Prod, in the other the Gateway tech QUAL. The differences in duration between the 2 refreshes therefore depend on the Gateway, its network or its ability to communicate with the PowerBI.com bus. On the AWS PROD Gateway, there is a peak between 0 and 3 hours, which corresponds to the period during which this Gateway is "overloaded". During this period, refresh times can be multiplied by 10 or 15 on a few occasions between 0:00 and 3:00 and then around 6:00, every day, including weekends. No parameter monitored on the Gateway server confirms this overload, and in fact it has been resized twice, doubling the size, with no improvement and probably generating unnecessary costs. We need to identify the source of this limitation in order to find a solution.
RE:
I agree, AAD ( MS Entra ) authentication towards PostgreSQL Flexible Servers would be something we would really need
RE:
ATP Issue: Inaccurate Second Customer Order Fulfillment Our use of ATP is causing significant inaccuracies, particularly with non-stock items already on order with extended marking. Despite the items on the active Purchase/Production Orders being set as Ordered reserved, ATP fails to honor the reservations. Consequently, the Requested Ship Date provided to the second customer aligns with the earlier receipt date of the first customer's fulfillment order. This discrepancy leads to erroneous ship dates for the second customer. It's crucial for ATP to recognize active Purchase/Production Orders with markings to ensure precise availability calculations. Despite efforts, we've been unable to rectify this issue through our current settings.
RE:
Frankly absurd that this isn't available yet.
RE:
Just checking in to see if the idea I put in a year ago had any traction and found this one from 2017.I guess we're not getting this feature any time soon.
RE:
(RummyBo.Com) Indian rummy gives away ₹51 bonus website listhttps://rummybo.com
RE:
Another example. I would like to give developers the ability to subcribe customers to reports in the production workspace. Currently this requires giving them edit/delete permissions to the production workspace.I should be able to custom edit their permissions to give them access to subscriptions without giving them the ability to delete content.
RE:
It seems that just updating the data file (like.csv) does not refresh the report at all. Updating the .pbix just for the sake of refreshing data is a real pain, especially since we are using the deployment pipelines. It would be extremely beneficial if report would be updated (even within an hour) when data file is updated,
RE:
i think Remove Prepayment feature is there, which is like credit note to Prepayment invoice.
RE:
Yes, please is needed for companies with multible legal entities.