on
RE:
Any updates?A default purchasing unit per procurement category would also be interesting, analogous to the item sales tax group on the procurement category. Users are forgetting selecting a UOM.
RE:
On top on the ability to order/display Jobs by start date/time (at least like a order option added under the left panel options) . I think MS needs to improve the "display" of the left section of the Gantt Chart. So columns are aligned properly within the left section. Now the information is all over the place and the user is forced to adjust manually the width of each column. Currently, there is no function to save a "view" of the left panel view. So when the Gantt is closed and relaunched the information should be displayed according to the saved view, including the columns and the width of the columns
RE:
Our customer requires this as mandatory/critical feature to be able to use the Gantt chart to schedule the production jobs due to high number of jobs they need to manage every day.
RE:
Specifically need this on Job Planning Lines etc.
RE:
Hello,any news about that? The allocation rules, avoid to manage manually the ledger allocation. Have the opportunity to define an allocation journal to be managed with different layers would help a lot.
RE:
I support this idea. It will provide value data for securing good performance in the Cloud.
RE:
I'm facing similar issue. Since it's working for sharepoint lists would be great to have it also for sharepoint folders.
RE:
i use an ODBC connector installed on a virtual machine with IFR environment installed. all queries from an azure sql database (read and write) run smooth and within seconds , I use azure synapse for that. on the other side , we have power bi reports that connect to snowflake via gateway. some reports may take suddenly 2 hour + to refresh. does not happen every day , but probably every week. there seems to be a queue building up quick if it gets busy. a beter approach is highly welkome. PS i would not use Snowflake but prefer all data/jobs just on azure , but ok, it was not my choice. the costs of snowflake are 1 K oer day, and growing . this is risky. the company turns around 3B while making 800M loss. i wonder if they exist over 5 years . stay on Azure if you can.
RE:
Please prioritize this idea. Due to missing sufficient access to SQL-server in Azure Cloud we need to be able to see a estimated impact of certain missing Index.
RE:
People are waiting for years already! @msft