Skip to main content

Vote (0) Share
's profile image

on

Comments (0)
's profile image Profile Picture

Thian Sze Patrick Goh on 13 Feb 2025 05:36:38

RE:

Basic feature necessary for sales operations involving tangible and non-tangible products and services, definitely a "NEED TO HAVE...not a nice to have" solution.

's profile image Profile Picture

LiHuang Lim on 13 Feb 2025 05:29:57

RE:

Good idea.

's profile image Profile Picture

ChiWei Ng on 13 Feb 2025 03:04:25

RE:

It is common to have a combined invoice (normally customer preference) for multiple Sales order, some with allocation and some without. Allocation needed for some orders due to contribution from different BUs. This should be a standard feature.

's profile image Profile Picture

Dorcas Lee on 13 Feb 2025 02:20:39

RE:

Single SO Invoice reduce processing time and increase productivity, achieving GEPO.

's profile image Profile Picture

Margaret Leong on 13 Feb 2025 02:07:01

RE:

it will improve efficiency, reduce manual revenue allocation errors and prevent manipulation of invoices for fraudulent transaction.

's profile image Profile Picture

NgiapKim Pang on 13 Feb 2025 01:55:47

RE:

This is business needs as in each sales contract, the sales price incorporate different BU's revenue and hence we have to apportion the revenue for the respective BU the correct measurement of their profitability. Without the customisation, we have to manually pass a Free text debit and credit note to apportion the revenue. This takes up lots of time and the reporting of revenue is lagging as we have to wait for the posting of Free text debit and credit note.

's profile image Profile Picture

Kathleen Elisabeth Smith on 13 Feb 2025 00:39:07

RE:

there's 50 other ideas like this. if they merged them they'd probably get enough votes

's profile image Profile Picture

Alberto Ramon on 12 Feb 2025 23:39:21

RE:

Is not a rejection, but is a limit . . .SKU Guardrail: Limit the burstable SKU escalation to a maximum

's profile image Profile Picture

Stephen O'Connor Jr on 12 Feb 2025 20:51:41

RE:

Completely agree with this and for as much praise as I have given PowerBi in the last 7 years the one thing I always have to scratch my head about is the lack of an easy to use, clean, presentable and flexible gantt chart tool available. Especially when Microsoft Owns Microsoft Project, Project Online, Project for the web, Planner, Tasks, etc. So much potential here for a simple and flexible solution. Suggest the team looks at 3rd party tools for inspiration such as Office Timeline Plus, OnePager Pro and Thinkcell for some advanced features. My "off the top of my head" wish list: I want to be able to add a row to this chart based off of a name of something and then group that row by another fieldI want to be able to create swimlanesI want to be able to just add a start and end date to the visual to create the bar itselfI want to be able to filter the view for a specific window (e.g., this year) or have it start from "today"I want to be able to add text that will be inside or outside the bar (like a data label) and have this text be anything I want. (Dollar total amount, Resource name)I want the bar color to be able to be calculated (e.g., RAG status) or flexible and set by the visual or categories in the visualI want robust control of the bar settings (height, colors, rounding vs. square, etc.)I want to be able to call out milestones using a singular date field and a singular name field and then control whether these are a symbol or a drill down under the rowThe left table should be almost as robust as the matrix visual so that you can drill down into details

's profile image Profile Picture

Carol Sikes on 12 Feb 2025 19:55:21

RE:

My last two clients have both needed this functionality as well and used enhancements to achieve it.