on
RE:
Would love the ability to do this particularly when axis labels are acronyms and the text could provide the explanation to those unfamiliar.Another use posed this question in January 2023 - https://community.fabric.microsoft.com/t5/Desktop/Customize-Y-Axis-category-tooltips-hover-text-with-longer/td-p/3042914
RE:
Agreed. It would be immensely helpful if this feature was available for activation. The built in topic summarization function on conversation is limited in the number of languages which it supports. Being able to store the conversation summarizations in a table would allow customers to utilize other topic analysis tools (e.g. from AI builder) to perform topic clustering and topic identification functions to better gain insights into what their end customer's are contacting them about and what is currently trending.
RE:
This feature / function is required not only for Intercompany orders but also how all purchase returns are handled in WMS App. We need function to release to warehouse lines which have a 'negative' (stock removal) indication. This should work in similar way how the Sales Pick / Put work - just that the reference has to be of a 'Vendor ID' instead of a 'Customer'
RE:
Any update on the feature.
RE:
Hello,the same requirement is coming from our customer. The parameter is hardcoded now and our customer would like to control it. No performance issues were reported for journals with more than 1000 lines so far. Thank you.
RE:
This feature would be very useful. Ideally it needs to allow you select which manually set elements stay (such as titles including conditionally set titles) and which are replaced by the theme settings (such as colours and font properties), as these should be treated very differently. The first you likely want to keep when applying a theme, the second you likely don't. Without this feature it is very long-winded to apply a theme to an already written report.
RE:
It would also be useful to have this at load header level, for quick identification of loads which do not have all work creation. This is one of the holes in our release / work creation validation
RE:
Users who frequently move between warehouses bump up against this regularly, and the errors that hint at the problem (eg. LP doesn' exist / seeing an empty lookup) don't directly tell you what the problem is
RE:
We've found this awkward in the scenario where pallets are not labelled. Receive by item would be convenient as can enquire on the transfer order lines but this isn't available where the TRANSIT location is LP controlled. We have worked around it by looking up the LP using the closed work lines for the transfer order pick - however this isn't ideal and the list doesn't shorten as LPs are scanned in