on
RE:
Please disregard
RE:
This is a large issue within our company and we use a 4-4-5 fiscal calendar too. Our work around is to use the 15th of each month as that always falls within the proper fiscal period for us.But that requires our team only using the batch posting and hanging the posting date for every single leasing batch posting. It is quite easy to miss and then requires rework to correct. This causes other troubles: validating the leasing schedules requires transforming to the right fiscal period as well. The Short-term/long-term journals must be manually updated with the right date after entry.
RE:
Very much needed!The only way to build systems that don't rot is to have simple processes for changing things.This is a major missing feature that prevents us from doing that.
RE:
I find it strange that this is not implemented before you shipped your product. Who wants webinar attendees to see each other?
RE:
I agree. A very important feature for us is the Q&A in webinars as we do not always want an unmanaged chat in the event. The lack of functionality has made us revert to Live events, but the 20-30 second lag of those events provide a suboptimal experience. The ability to hide attendees and enable Q&A are very much needed for running webinars.
RE:
I have a similar idea for configuring actions of a button. In my case I have a Drilltrough page with 3 different layouts with their own Bookmarks. It should be possible to make combinations of Drilltrough page A / Bookmark1 , Drilltrough page A / Bookmark2 , Drilltrough page A / Bookmark3. In my case there are three Drilltrough pages to go to from an item in my report. Users want to navigate directly from 1 Drilltrough page to another without having to go back to the sourcepage to select the same item again and choose another Drilltroughpage.
RE:
This is highly needed!
RE:
Good idea. Will be very beneficial for all BC customers.
RE:
But - if I understand is correctly, RDLC is not the desired way to go anymore... What about WORD layouts - is this scenario also applicable here?
RE:
G/L Review does not have a functionality for accrued accounts, meaning it does not provide for remaining amounts as does the Dutch local functionality. Why not make a proper solution before discontinuing current functionality?