on
RE:
Either this or make the legends as a separate part of the page so they can be moved/sized to somewhere I have white space.
RE:
I was unable to update the comment above, but here are some thoughts. Solution considerations:Create a parameter to activate change management for direct delivery POs and a separate parameter for intercompany POsProcurement and sourcing > Setup > Procurement and sourcing parameters > Default values and parameters FastTab > Change management for purchase orders grouping > "Activate PO workflow for direct delivery POs"Re-visit the change management logic that currently resides on a vendor record. Ex: I may use a vendor for both direct delivery AND inventory POs, the current logic requires me to bypass PO workflow if I want to use that vendor for direct deliveries. However, if I use that same vendor for a regular PO, that setting will allow the regular PO to bypass workflow. It shouldn't be an all or nothing setting. Regular POs should still go through workflow for that vendor.Procurement and sourcing > Vendors > All vendors > Purchase order defaults FastTab > Change management for Purchase Orders > Allow override of settings per purchase orderNew logic is required here to potentially activate or deactivate for direct delivery orders. This new logic can override the Procurement parameters for the vendor. There's opportunity for improvement, but note that it's common for a client to require approval on ALL types of POs (Direct delivery, standard PO, planned PO, etc..)
RE:
This is such an important idea - please fix it as soon as possible! It is extremely annoying not being able to conditionally format e.g. legend series through a simple fx formula; or automatically set a slicer to a default value from a measure (or fx field).Also upvote the idea that was posted in this thread as well. I could also see values in being able to specify certain bookmarks through fx functions.
RE:
A third option should be added - let users select whether credit management should be checked against the main customer account, or the invoice account, or both. "Both" because when we are releasing an order for dispatch, we need to knowIs the invoice / Head Office account paying its bills on time?Does the Head Office need to authorise this franchisee's order before we can release it?Thanks for your consideration!
RE:
This could be a good alternative to the issue I ran into recently - the inability to apply a filter directly to a button. As long as it would work with images formatted to the visual as well!
RE:
Clients continue to have this functional requirement. All POs (including direct delivery) need to go through workflow. Is this on a short-term roadmap?
RE:
It is a know problem. MS do not trust AWS certificates. You cannot directly refresh from AWS cloud postgres. You can use an onprem-gateway, or move to Azure postgres.
RE:
You can't download reports that don't have semantic models (i.e. are linked). The only report you can download is the default semantic report. I wish MS would cleanly separate the report from the semantic model and edit/set authorization independently.
RE:
Do you mean add a membership level that means they can edit the report temporarily, but not save changes?
RE:
Everyone has been asking for this for forever.While we realise it's not true security - all the data is still in the report, it simply make the reports easier to use.Do a search for "hidden pages" and get upvoting!