Skip to main content

Vote (0) Share
's profile image

on

Comments (0)
's profile image Profile Picture

Josep Pagès on 20 Dec 2024 11:32:58

RE:

I don’t know why this idea has been rejected because it seems very interesting. Since it’s not possible to interact with the existing columns via AL, at least the system should allow hiding those that are not useful, such as the sales price.

's profile image Profile Picture

Andrey Kudryavets on 20 Dec 2024 11:24:26

RE:

We use Power BI in combination with SQL Server. For many of our tables, we maintain system versioning, which allows us to "travel back in time." The point in time to travel is selected by the user, leaving us with a few options:Import History Tables into Power BI:This approach places significant pressure on infrastructure due to the large size of the tables and results in a poor user experience. Additionally, we lose near real-time data freshness and nice sql syntax "FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF ".Use M Parameters with SQL Query Manipulation:This setup involves manipulating SQL queries as strings. While it can be done, it is super obscure way that makes sense only for very simple "SLECT * FROM " type of queries. Something a little more complex will be very difficult to write, read, change, and test.Fallback to SSRS Reports:Currently, this is our chosen solution.The same logic applies to any situation where a large amount of data for fetching could be significantly reduced by applying user selection.We aim to phase out SSRS and fully adopt Power BI. However, Power BI still lacks features to effectively supersede SSRS in scenarios like these. Is there a plan to address this limitation and improve the situation?

's profile image Profile Picture

Roberto Ruiz Gimeno on 20 Dec 2024 10:25:12

RE:

Great idea!

's profile image Profile Picture

Linnéa Gustafsson on 20 Dec 2024 09:20:15

RE:

Please fix this ASAP!

's profile image Profile Picture

Povl Odgaard on 20 Dec 2024 07:47:23

RE:

Completely agree with above. You can achieve it quite easily with a little bit of code. Please spend the 15 minutes it takes to do this. This is the time it takes for a developer to make this happen. I've just done it myself using events.Also, from an accounting point of view, I have a hard time understanding why it's not running the postings from a report that you have to call like it was done with "Calculate Depreciations" - this is really bad design accountants perspective.

's profile image Profile Picture

Tine Faith Madsen on 20 Dec 2024 07:41:15

RE:

Agree!!!

's profile image Profile Picture

on 20 Dec 2024 07:21:29

RE:

We require this feature to be available out-of-the-box (OOB). Please let us know if it can be included in the roadmap.

's profile image Profile Picture

Chaianan Jantoo on 20 Dec 2024 05:09:42

RE:

Why system allowed delete vendor postdated check with staus "posted"?

's profile image Profile Picture

Quinn Pham on 20 Dec 2024 04:58:53

RE:

Hi Development Team,My name is Quinn, and I am part of the Microsoft Support team. Recently, we have been receiving a growing number of cases from customers expressing concerns in utilizing the New Vendor Creation Approval Workflow feature. Upon further investigation, it became evident that this interest is also shared by other customers on platforms such as Yammer and the Microsoft Idea Portal.In light of the widespread demand and potential benefits of this feature, I believe its implementation is critical and could significantly enhance our offerings. Therefore, I am seeking your consideration for the inclusion of this feature in your future development roadmap.Thank you for considering this request. I anticipate your acknowledgement and hope we can collaboratively meet customer needs.Best regards,Quinn

's profile image Profile Picture

Thomas Evans on 19 Dec 2024 21:30:44

RE:

Yes, we need this!