RE:
I've ran into a Cloud/SaaS use case where we'd really like to have this feature.Our customer needs to connect to an external API (using the HttpClient object) that uses allowlisting/whitelisting.Unfortunately Business Central Cloud/SaaS doesn't define a dedicated IP range where all HttpClient connections originate from. In short, in static allowlist scenarios one should add all AzureCloud. (westeurope in our case) ranges.Adding a complete Azure cloud region to the allowlist is unacceptable for the third party.So, we'll have to add some sort of proxy/middleware/API Management in between to let the IP connections originate from Business Central.As an added complicating factor, the connection to the third party needs to work with a client certificate. This is well supported in modern BC versions, so from a an On-Premise install (with allowlisted IP address(es)) this works flawlessly.If we were able to use a proxy on the HttpClient object we would be able to "just" use any explicit forward proxy and still let the encryption and client certificate handling be done by Business Central.Unfortunately, without proxy support in AL (or as Volker Krausse suggested: extension/tenant wide support in BC for a proxy for every HttpClient), we'll have to come up with a different solution where we're connecting to some middleware (With a static IP address) that creates another connection to the third party. This means the middleware will need to know about and use the client certificate. And this also means that now there is a different place where administration needs to happen to keep this interface up and running. We'd really like to see this become simpler in the future.So, yes, we would really like to allow setting a Proxy for the HttpClient in SaaS/Cloud scenarios.
RE:
i agree
RE:
This is something we really need, why show a column in Edit Fields when it is set to hide
RE:
I Agree with the Admin Interface as the primary solution. It is key for us to be able to make decisions around scenarios like this to ensure the good adoption from the general population and prevent misuse of the services.
RE:
Hello,You have been considering supporting this from Sep 2021. Could you please provide us with a solution along with a release date?Thank you
RE:
Would be perfect.Sometimes projects have a lot of tasks (more than 1000). In this case you want to split it in several subprojects.
RE:
In order to have the materials at hand when you are at a certain step in your project, you order them in time.Just in time is tricky.You want to know where the materials are stored and want to pick them.Makes the process for stock based on projects and stock based on sales orders more identical for the users.Would be great to have this in place.
RE:
Can't find it on the roadmap. Is there a timeline for this feature? It would be really great to have this feature.https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/release-plan/data-factory
RE:
Currently we also face this issue and it sounds a normal business scenario that inventory is received and put away on a project. Then reservation entries should be able to connect to the project/task
RE:
Agree this is an essential feature and strongly required.