on
RE:
This feature will make powerbi stand apart from myriad of BI solutions available. Please take this up on priority.
RE:
The published workaround is NOT OPTIMAL. For example, it will break if run concurrently by more than one job (there will be duplicate values for the "unique" column). I hope Microsoft is not delaying the implementation of this feature because they think there is a good workaround -- this workaround is not good. The identity feature needs to be built into the column definition, as it is with on-prem SQL Server.
RE:
This would be highly desirable behaviour and would make it much easier to track who has carried out particular transactions. Both our businesses on D365 (a Bakery and a food wholesale business) would strongly appreciate this
RE:
(The same message is given when the PO has change management turned on and is in "Draft" status)
RE:
We have also found this error message very unclear and unhelpful
RE:
we need this option
RE:
That is when one chooses "export as image"
RE:
Availability in report 11000014, thank you. But the new address structure is nog available in this report, when is that to be expected ?Old Format:XML Naam Ontvanger NL New format:XML Naam Ontvanger Straatnaam Huisnummer Postcode Plaatsnaam NL Regards,Frank Groot Roessink
RE:
What does "Fabric will have better support for this and will be a better choice" comment from Administrator mean? Where can we find out more about this approach?
RE:
We need this too. Strange that it isn't there yet. This is becoming the standard...