on
RE:
Availability in report 11000014, thank you. But the new address structure is nog available in this report, when is that to be expected ?Old Format:XML Naam Ontvanger NL New format:XML Naam Ontvanger Straatnaam Huisnummer Postcode Plaatsnaam NL Regards,Frank Groot Roessink
RE:
What does "Fabric will have better support for this and will be a better choice" comment from Administrator mean? Where can we find out more about this approach?
RE:
We need this too. Strange that it isn't there yet. This is becoming the standard...
RE:
Hello,I would like to highlight this significant limitation in the subscription billing module: its inability to issue credit notes for a specific period efficiently. The current process of creating separate sales orders for credit notes and then issuing the correct invoice is not a viable solution, particularly because it requires extensive manual work.The subscription billing module allows for mass billing across numerous contracts / billing schedules. For example, when billing customers based on consumption, where quantities vary each month, you can import the data into billing schedule details and issue all invoices at once. Now, imagine handling 1,500 contracts / billing schedules, but the quantities or prices are incorrect. In such a case, you would need to manually create 1,500 sales orders for credit notes and another 1,500 for the corrected invoices. This process is simply unworkable.The module should offer a more intelligent solution. Moreover, using reports through the subscription billing module is redundant if credit notes are created manually through sales orders.Microsoft must address this as a significant gap in the module. The solution should be more intelligent and automated.
RE:
+1
RE:
We’re dealing with a chain of linked transfer orders that need updating. Our inventory produced at production, consists of a single 11-ton piece (compared to planned qty 10), which can only be fully reserved for one order at a time. It can’t be partially reserved for another order (e.g., 1 ton reserved elsewhere).
RE:
Please remove the counts on the filter panel, we have confusion about these not matching the data with our customers.
RE:
Hi all, we previously released Power BI apps with audiences in response to your request for multiple apps per workspace. While audiences have been a great addition to Power BI apps, we heard your feedback on how audiences weren't the same as multiple apps. We met with many customers on building multiple apps per workspace and how we would approach your need to build unique apps tailored to each audience you serve...Introducing org apps as items, now in preview:Get started with org apps (preview)https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/consumer/org-app-items/org-app-itemsWith org apps as items, from a single workspace you can create multiple distinct org apps tailored to each unique audience you serve. Each org app will have its own unique set of content, navigation, custom theme color, and name. And you can manage org apps the way you would any other item type – from creating a new org app, to managing access, or sharing an org app – what you find familiar about managing other items, like reports, will be familiar with org apps as items.We will leave this idea marked as "Planned" as we work through Public Preview, take your feedback, and then launch as Generally Available.Org apps as items are not at parity with Power BI workspace apps, yet. We will be listening to and working with customers to make sure we prioritize the most important aspects of Power BI workspace apps to be mirrored in org apps as items. Commenting here on this idea or submitting new ideas to this community forum will be helpful in prioritizing what's next for org app items.Thank you for your continued feedback and contributions in the community. 🙌
RE:
Revisiting this. The Idea is marked as completed, but not really implemented. The Service Tag addition does not really cover anything else but services within Azure itself. Typically this need comes from other, lecacy, and often on premises systems. We have also used the Proxy Azure Function method, but it's not very pretty.Instead of having service tags only, could we have attached the business central service to a VNET or assigned a static IP to an environment, like for a number of other Azure services, I would have been happy
RE:
Great idea. Please consider for implementation