on
RE:
Yes, setting these to unchecked as the default will prevent users from unknowingly over sharing data and permissions and follows the secure-by-default principle. Allow recipients to share this reportAllow recipients to build content with the data associated with this report
RE:
I can see why this is expected behavior from a data governance perspective. Data connections are the ideal way to manage this behavior.
RE:
What's missing from this idea is how to determine how to aggregate the measure. The only way I can see this working is if page-level filters for measures could somehow specify the filter context (and there are some options that require additional input, such as Top N). That, I think is why measures can't be used as page-level filters currently.
RE:
+100000 from United States. This would be so great to have.
RE:
Also an improvement is to show all GL accounts that are missing and don't stop by the first error and just showing 1 GL account number. Please provide an overview with all GL-accounts numbers from which Business Unit.
RE:
It would be very helpful. During the calculation process it should be possible to select calculation rule via Record to include, which should be used.
RE:
I agree with Ted. This feature would enable us to identify the report that generated a particular query. Why is this important? Because, in an organization that runs 100's of Power BI reports in Snowflake, when a query is running long it is terminated by the DBA team and we need a way to identify the report that generated the query so we can fix the query (i.e., make it more efficiient)
RE:
This is really an issue causing the mrp calculation going wrong seeing the inventory of the special order as free inventory for other orders since special orders are not taking in account in the standard mrp calculation and the extra needed item will not be proposed to be ordered. This leads to stock shortages at customers. Please take this issue seriously.
RE:
Dear Microsoft Admin - your github link is incorrect.
RE:
Any update on this? Wasn't included in latest v24.This would be a massive time save for management of both Sales and Purchase price lists.