RE:
My client has the same requirement to able to change the receiving warehouse/delivery address on a goods in transit order but is not able to due to the purchase order being invoiced. This scenario is so frequent for the client that they have decided to switch off goods in transit orders all together. The system should allow you to update the final warehouse/delivery address on the goods in transit order.
RE:
The ability to share segments across team CSEs is a priority and defaulting to today's date for journeys just makes sense.
RE:
The ability to share segments across team CSEs is game changer and defaulting to today's date for journeys just makes sense.
RE:
This is needed to be fixed. As Scenario, the due dates can be the same as for usual invoices for the customer. Or it can have its own Terms of payment. So this should be possible to set Terms of payment for Interests codes.
RE:
I would like to emphasize that the solution we need will greatly contribute to our accounting department working much more efficiently in the system. Our current solution is very manual and time-consuming. Implementing this fix will significantly improve our workflow and productivity. Please let me know if there is any additional information I can provide. I hope you put pressure on this case so the fix will be given priority and resolved in a timely manner.
RE:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/release-plan/data-engineeringhttps://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/release-plan/data-warehousehttps://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/release-plan/data-factoryCan someone tell me which one of these roadmaps states that this is being worked on, because I do not see any evidence of it. And what blog has these updates?
RE:
The External Catalog / Punchout functionality offers excellent efficiencies. However, without being able to handle freight charges via Charges codes (or other options) the functionality is severely limited. We will not be able to use this for some of our largest vendors.
RE:
I support this idea. Actually I think it could be even more granular than Persona. I think we should be able to even select specific Item types.
RE:
Please provide a more recent update on this. It's been six months and this is a very highly requested feature. Let's now force customers to use 3rd party tools for something basic like this that even Excel can do.
RE:
This would be really useful; I could do with this functionality most days.