RE:
早く実現して欲しい
RE:
I am really missing that as well!
RE:
Hello, I have the same need and scrolled through the internet to find this idea promotion. Are there any updates about this?
RE:
We (as a client) have now run into this issue. We are unable to properly cost our BOM's due to requiring the use of non-inventory items. A 'workaround' is to create resources for each of these non-inventory lines as those costs seem be able rolled up into the cost of the BOM. While this works, its a crude way to managing inventory and costs. I would ask MS to either explain the reason why non-inventory costs are not included in the roll-up of BOM's or, fix this bug to allow proper BOM creation and management.
RE:
A must have indeed I'd say this is a bug that needs to be looked at.
RE:
The heat map is definitely needed. Please bring it back!
RE:
Please have this export to excel option enabled as the visual looks. It would be of great help
RE:
This would be extremely helpful for one of my clients!
RE:
Hi @Kieran Leigh, I have found a solution (or a workaround by us developing M codes).Define Dynamic Data Types in Power Query by Goodly (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD-7Tt8-oOk)Also: The Magic of Working with Lists in Power Query by Goodly (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90atXaUhBec)
RE:
I would like to know if this issue will soon be considered? It is pretty much a standard that product configurators should be able to handle a higher decimal precision.